arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Lost in Translation? A Scoping Review to Explore the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Preference-Based Measures of Quality of Life

Jenny Cleland et al.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01042-6article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This review highlights the variable transparency and inconsistency in the methods adopted for the translation and cultural adaptation of PBMs. The application of standardised translation and cultural adaptation guidelines, such as the ones developed by ISPOR, would enhance the methodological quality and cultural validity of PBMs.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01042-6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jenny2026,
  title        = {{Lost in Translation? A Scoping Review to Explore the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Preference-Based Measures of Quality of Life}},
  author       = {Jenny Cleland et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Health Economics and Health Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-026-01042-6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Lost in Translation? A Scoping Review to Explore the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Preference-Based Measures of Quality of Life

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.