School district investments in general skills: The case of principal residency programs

Minh Nguyen et al.

IZA Journal of Labor Economics2023https://doi.org/10.2478/izajole-2023-0001article
ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Districts are investing more in school leadership, including the implementation of residency training programs for aspiring principals. There is limited evidence about the district return on these investments, and none in the context in which principal hiring is decentralized at the school level. This paper develops a model highlighting the conditions under which districts benefit from investments in general leadership skills and examines the residency program in the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). The event-study analysis that addresses treatment effect heterogeneity finds that principals who complete a residency are significantly more effective at raising achievement. Although the leadership skills gained through the residency are likely to make a principal more valuable to districts outside of CPS, the large majority of residents remain in CPS despite the absence of salary premia for completion of a residency or high performance. These findings suggest the presence of transition costs that enable CPS to retain more effective, residency-trained principals without having to increase pay, thereby realizing some of the return on the investment in general skills.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/izajole-2023-0001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{minh2023,
  title        = {{School district investments in general skills: The case of principal residency programs}},
  author       = {Minh Nguyen et al.},
  journal      = {IZA Journal of Labor Economics},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/izajole-2023-0001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

School district investments in general skills: The case of principal residency programs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.28 × 0.4 = 0.11
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.