Strategies to Improve Financial Profitability in the Banking Industry

khalid Makki Said & Yvonne Doll

International Journal of Applied Management and Technology2021https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2021.20.1.03article
ABDC C
Weight
0.39

What the paper says

More than 50% of business failures in the United States are because of leaders’ inability to manage working capital. This qualitative, multiple case study is grounded in the cash conversion cycle theory. The purpose is to explore the strategies bank leaders have used to improve working capital management in three banks in Kentucky to increase bank profitability and improve financial stability. Data were collected using semistructured interviews with three different banking leaders who have implemented successful working capital strategies. Using methodological triangulation and Yin’s five-step data analysis resulted: (a) risk and liquidity, (b) top-down approach, and (c) investment approach. The findings from this study include strategies for improving the use of working capital, leading to business profitability and increases in employment opportunities.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2021.20.1.03

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{khalid2021,
  title        = {{Strategies to Improve Financial Profitability in the Banking Industry}},
  author       = {khalid Makki Said & Yvonne Doll},
  journal      = {International Journal of Applied Management and Technology},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2021.20.1.03},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Strategies to Improve Financial Profitability in the Banking Industry

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.39

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.11 × 0.4 = 0.04
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.