Entangled Material Literacy: Nonfiction Forest Writings and Forest Experience for a Relational Ecocritical Pedagogy

Chi‐On Ng

Australian Journal of Environmental Education2026https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10115article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Ecocriticism often employs a mimetic, text-based model that includes literary analysis of canonical nature writings complemented with wilderness excursions seeking verification of literary representations and place-based experience. I suggest that in order to better integrate ecocriticism within the Environmental Humanities’ decolonial and material turns, a pedagogy of “entangled material literacy” should be explored. This approach, grounded in biosemiotics and new materialist thought, enables a relational reading of nonfiction forest writings like Suzanne Simard’s Finding the Mother Tree and Peter Wohlleben’s The Hidden Life of Trees , positioning the forest as a co-author in these works. Aligning with critical forest studies, this project examines the forest’s biosemiotic intelligence and agential multiplicities in human–nonhuman communicative meaning-making. Moreover, as reflected by the authors’ personal connections to forests, I argue that teaching entangled material literacy necessitates embodied experience, where the forest becomes a co-teacher, cultivating students’ competency for responsive engagement with a sentient more-than-human world.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10115

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chi‐on2026,
  title        = {{Entangled Material Literacy: Nonfiction Forest Writings and Forest Experience for a Relational Ecocritical Pedagogy}},
  author       = {Chi‐On Ng},
  journal      = {Australian Journal of Environmental Education},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10115},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Entangled Material Literacy: Nonfiction Forest Writings and Forest Experience for a Relational Ecocritical Pedagogy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.