arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Overturning Chevron Won’t Change Much—And What Was So Great About Chevron , Anyway?

Ben Merriman

Administration and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997251329336article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The 2024 overturning of Chevron will have modest immediate effects: the Supreme Court was already fiercely skeptical of major administrative action, and appeals courts will seek to maintain a pragmatic, labor-saving respect for agencies that leaves settled legal questions undisturbed. But overturning Chevron is part of wider doctrinal shifts unfriendly to administration and favorable to elected partisans. This trend cannot be changed, or even clearly understood, within the premises of modern administrative law, which have frayed law’s ties to administrative practice. A critical review of those premises and revival of preceding, alternative constitutional visions of administration are sorely needed.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997251329336

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ben2025,
  title        = {{Overturning Chevron Won’t Change Much—And What Was So Great About Chevron , Anyway?}},
  author       = {Ben Merriman},
  journal      = {Administration and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997251329336},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Overturning Chevron Won’t Change Much—And What Was So Great About Chevron , Anyway?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.