Contextualizing norms: international organizations and the creation of resilient policy norms

Antje Vetterlein & Tobias Schmidtke

Journal of International Relations and Development2025https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-025-00355-8article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract Understanding the role of international norms has been a prominent theme in International Relations, alongside studying International Organizations (IOs) as norm diffusers. Combining both literatures, this article examines the conditions under which IOs create resilient policy norms. Resilience is defined as the ability of norms to retain their essential elements while being enacted over time. Drawing on informal governance, localization, and translation approaches in the IO and norms literature, we understand IOs as social sites where international norms are transformed into ‘policy norms’. We propound that norms emerging internally through bottom-up processes within IOs become more resilient owing to a better knowledge of the organizational culture and higher norm ownership by staff. We introduce four degrees of resilience—endurance, elasticity, flexibility, and fragility—which we illustrate empirically by comparing four policy cases: capital account liberalization and poverty reduction in the IMF, and anti-corruption and sustainable agriculture in the World Bank.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-025-00355-8

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{antje2025,
  title        = {{Contextualizing norms: international organizations and the creation of resilient policy norms}},
  author       = {Antje Vetterlein & Tobias Schmidtke},
  journal      = {Journal of International Relations and Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-025-00355-8},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Contextualizing norms: international organizations and the creation of resilient policy norms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.