Revenue Maximization and Learning in Product Ranking

Ningyuan Chen et al.

Operations Research2026https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0781article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The Price of Attention: Ranking Products for Maximum Revenue How should an online retailer rank products when customers have limited attention spans? Chen, Li, and Yang tackle this classic problem by extending the well-known cascade model to account for two crucial, real-world factors: customers view only a random number of items, and the firm’s goal is to maximize revenue, not just clicks. This creates a difficult trade-off between ranking popular, low-price items and riskier, high-price ones. The authors propose the “Best-x” algorithm, an efficient method for finding a near-optimal ranking. They prove it guarantees a revenue of at least 1/e (approximately 37%) of that achievable by a clairvoyant who knows each customer’s attention span in advance. For cases where product attractiveness and attention distributions are unknown, the authors also devise the RankUCB online learning algorithm, which learns personalized rankings from customer interactions and achieves near-optimal performance over time.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0781

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ningyuan2026,
  title        = {{Revenue Maximization and Learning in Product Ranking}},
  author       = {Ningyuan Chen et al.},
  journal      = {Operations Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0781},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revenue Maximization and Learning in Product Ranking

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.