Negative Sampling in Recommendation: A Survey and Future Directions

Haokai Ma et al.

ACM Transactions on Information Systems2026https://doi.org/10.1145/3793855article
ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Recommender system (RS) aims to capture personalized preferences from massive user behaviors, making them pivotal in the era of information explosion. However, the presence of “information cocoons”, interaction sparsity, cold-start problem and feedback loops inherent in RS make users interact with a limited number of items. Conventional recommendation algorithms typically focus on the positive historical behaviors, while neglecting the essential role of negative feedback in user preference understanding. As a promising but easy-to-ignored area, negative sampling is proficients in revealing the genuine negative aspect inherent in user behaviors, emerging as an inescapable procedure in RS. In this survey, we first discuss existing user feedback, the critical role of negative sampling and the optimization objectives in RS and thoroughly analyze challenges that consistently impede its progress. Then, we conduct an extensive literature review on the existing negative sampling strategies in RS and classify them into five categories with their discrepant techniques. Finally, we detail the insights of the tailored negative sampling strategies in diverse RS scenarios and outline an overview of the prospective research directions toward which the community may engage and benefit.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3793855

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{haokai2026,
  title        = {{Negative Sampling in Recommendation: A Survey and Future Directions}},
  author       = {Haokai Ma et al.},
  journal      = {ACM Transactions on Information Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3793855},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Negative Sampling in Recommendation: A Survey and Future Directions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.