arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Market discipline and banking crises in Russia: A Reverse Engineered Pitch

Nurhastuty Kesumo Wardhani

Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS)2018https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2018.03010article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.32

What the paper says

Research is a long journey for a new early career researcher and PhD student. At the early stage, the new researcher needs to build up the “brick” foundation and to communicate well with the advisory team regarding their research progress. Pitching research developed by Faff (2015; 2017) can be a strong tool for answering the confusion of beginner researcher in their initial journey. This pitching research letter offers the author’s experience in implementing Faff’s (2015; 2017) template to the reverse engineering pitch in the area of banking market discipline. This pitching research template has been applied to a published article by Karas et al. (2013), who investigated the market discipline in Russian banking. In addition, this letter conveys a personal reflection regarding the pitching template.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2018.03010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nurhastuty2018,
  title        = {{Market discipline and banking crises in Russia: A Reverse Engineered Pitch}},
  author       = {Nurhastuty Kesumo Wardhani},
  journal      = {Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS)},
  year         = {2018},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2018.03010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Market discipline and banking crises in Russia: A Reverse Engineered Pitch

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.32

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.17 × 0.4 = 0.07
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.