arbiter
JournalsAccount

Which Path do You Choose, and Does It Matter? Industry Trajectories and Subsequent Earnings of Forced Migrants

Sofia Wixe & Johan Klæsson

Journal of Labor Research2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-025-09375-2article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper employs a novel two-step approach to examine the link between early industry experience and later income. First, we use sequence analysis to identify the typical industry trajectories followed between 1992 and 2011 by forced migrants from the Former Yugoslav Republic (FYR). Second, we estimate wage regressions for the period 2012–2021, using the assigned trajectory as the key variable of interest while accounting for both observed and unobserved individual characteristics. The results show that industry trajectories exhibit considerable stability over time, with manufacturing being the only industry identified as a stepping-stone to other sectors. Migrants who experience prolonged unemployment appear to face long-term consequences, earning lower incomes in future employment. By contrast, those who enter knowledge-intensive services tend to earn higher incomes, even after transitioning into lower-wage industries. Overall, the findings indicate a strong association between migrants’ earlier industry experiences and their later labor market outcomes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-025-09375-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sofia2025,
  title        = {{Which Path do You Choose, and Does It Matter? Industry Trajectories and Subsequent Earnings of Forced Migrants}},
  author       = {Sofia Wixe & Johan Klæsson},
  journal      = {Journal of Labor Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-025-09375-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Which Path do You Choose, and Does It Matter? Industry Trajectories and Subsequent Earnings of Forced Migrants

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.