arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Weakness of Strong States

Andrew G. Walder

Annual Review of Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081325-035403article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Analysts of social movements habitually conceive of political mobilization as a collective action problem, potentially misleading analysts about the nature of the conflicts. Collective action mobilizes individuals to pursue interests shared by a given group. Collective behavior is mobilization that undermines shared interests and splits existing groups, leading to unintended and collectively destructive outcomes. This article recounts several of the author's research projects into political upheavals in Mao-era China, in which movements initially thought to be a form of collective action focused by network ties turned out to be a form of collective behavior that undermined structurally strong dictatorships and the interests of their beneficiaries. The research revealed the hidden vulnerabilities of strong network ties and seemingly impregnable authoritarian structures built on them.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081325-035403

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2026,
  title        = {{The Weakness of Strong States}},
  author       = {Andrew G. Walder},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081325-035403},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Weakness of Strong States

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.