arbiter
JournalsAccount

Investor Behavior in Hedged Mutual Funds: Evidence on Risk Chasing and Misallocation

H. Zafer Yüksel et al.

Applied Finance Letters2026https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v15i.1070article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Hedged mutual funds (HMFs), employing hedge-fund-like strategies such as leverage, short-selling, and derivatives, have become a significant segment of the U.S. fund industry. These strategies generate returns tied to nontraditional or exotic risk factors, raising the question of whether investors can distinguish managerial skill from HMFS’ exotic risk exposures. Using U.S. data from 1994–2023, we examine fund flows with portfolio sorts, Fama–MacBeth regressions, and sentiment-based tests. We find that the apparent outperformance of positive-flow funds disappears once exotic risk factors are accounted for using the Fung–Hsieh (2001, 2004) model. Flows respond strongly to raw returns and Carhart alphas but not to Fung–Hsieh alphas, and they increase with exotic-risk exposures. These effects are concentrated in high-sentiment periods and among retail investors-tilted funds. Overall, our results show that HMF investors chase risk exposures rather than skill, amplifying misallocation risks in complex products.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v15i.1070

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{h.2026,
  title        = {{Investor Behavior in Hedged Mutual Funds: Evidence on Risk Chasing and Misallocation}},
  author       = {H. Zafer Yüksel et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Finance Letters},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v15i.1070},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Investor Behavior in Hedged Mutual Funds: Evidence on Risk Chasing and Misallocation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.