arbiter
JournalsAccount

The emotional side of collecting: disgust and attraction in the art market

Chiara Paolino et al.

International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwoe.2025.144496article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study delves into the exploration of a niche organisational culture within the art market, focusing on shared values that drive photography collectors' appreciation and acquisition of works considered repugnant by mainstream standards. The research aims to comprehend the emotional dynamics guiding collectors' choices, particularly regarding subjects that typically evoke negative emotions, such as explicit sexuality, deformity, illness, and death. Utilising an original dataset comprising 1,766 lots from 24 artists auctioned at major European events between 2013 and 2018, the analysis sheds light on intriguing trends. Collectors demonstrate a heightened inclination to purchase and invest higher prices in photographs featuring disturbing subjects compared to traditional ones. Qualitative interviews reveal that this positive evaluation is anchored in the categories of 'extraordinariness,' 'change,' and 'sophistication' associated with these artworks. This research provides insights into how shared values within niche organisational cultures shape organisational actors' preferences and behaviours in the art market.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwoe.2025.144496

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chiara2025,
  title        = {{The emotional side of collecting: disgust and attraction in the art market}},
  author       = {Chiara Paolino et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwoe.2025.144496},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The emotional side of collecting: disgust and attraction in the art market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.