The Ties That Rhyme: Duality in Symbolic and Structural Networks of Grime Music

Tom R. Leppard & Andrew P. Davis

British Journal of Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70087article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Do birds of a feather really sing together? Musicians face two competing pressures in the pursuit of success: conforming to genre norms to meet audience expectations and distinguishing themselves to attract the attention of listeners. These opposing logics may shape how artists choose their collaborators. Partnering with similar artists can reinforce genre alignment, while working with dissimilar collaborators may help artists stand out. This paper explores how these dynamics play out through the lens of homophily in musical collaboration. Drawing on network analysis, we develop a framework for measuring cultural proximity using song-level and collaboration data sourced from Spotify's API. Focusing on the understudied genre of Grime, we investigate whether the pull of similarity-the tendency to form homophilous ties-overrides competitive pressures within the genre.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70087

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tom2026,
  title        = {{The Ties That Rhyme: Duality in Symbolic and Structural Networks of Grime Music}},
  author       = {Tom R. Leppard & Andrew P. Davis},
  journal      = {British Journal of Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70087},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Ties That Rhyme: Duality in Symbolic and Structural Networks of Grime Music

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.