arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Employee diversity and litigation risk: Evidence from the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Erik Devos et al.

Journal of Financial Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70032article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We examine the valuation effects of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which increases potential litigation over discriminatory compensation. Firms with relatively fewer women exhibit significant 3‐day abnormal returns of −0.61% around the passage of the Act, whereas firms with more women show no effect. Low‐female firms also display larger increases in implied cost of capital and larger decreases in expected cash flow than high‐female firms. No significant differences emerge based on racial diversity. Results suggest that investors perceive increased litigation risk and imply that firms in industries with higher gender pay gaps could increase value by reducing the pay gap.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70032

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erik2026,
  title        = {{Employee diversity and litigation risk: Evidence from the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act}},
  author       = {Erik Devos et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Financial Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70032},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Employee diversity and litigation risk: Evidence from the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.