arbiter
JournalsAccount

Collaboration for Tackling Grand Challenges: A Curated Conversation

Stephan Leixnering et al.

Journal of Management Inquiry2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926251330828article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

In this Curated conversation, we bring together five scholars with a shared interest in collaborative approaches to grand challenges but who offer distinct approaches and foci. Our intention is to deepen the conversation between different communities in management research, with the ultimate objective of exploring potential avenues for mutual inspiration, learning, ­and collaboration. In their individual essays, the contributors to this conversation offer pointed insights into different aspects of collaboration in the context of grand challenges. In addition, we identify four pivotal themes across these essays, which, so we argue, constitute suitable foci for scholarly collaboration across community boundaries with the potential to recenter the “big picture” of collaboration. Our hope is to facilitate cross-pollination and thereby generate additional rigorous, realistic, and actionable approaches to the topic.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926251330828

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stephan2025,
  title        = {{Collaboration for Tackling Grand Challenges: A Curated Conversation}},
  author       = {Stephan Leixnering et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Inquiry},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926251330828},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Collaboration for Tackling Grand Challenges: A Curated Conversation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.