arbiter
JournalsAccount

Is time of the essence? A temporal meta-synthesis of seven media effects theories

Nathan Walter et al.

Journal of Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf032article
ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

The media effects discipline has bequeathed scholars with an endlessly pliable set of theories helping establish the field of communication. Recent decades, however, witnessed a growing chorus of criticism pointing to theories’ anachronistic nature to suggest that ideas once known for their originality and conceptual heft overstayed their welcome. If there is intellectual disagreement, it is in fact a propitious moment to infuse the marketplace of ideas with critical data. To this end, meta- and interrupted time series-analyses of seven key media effects theories (K = 588, N = 525,670) identify a decline in effect sizes over time, while moderation analyses point to methodological and technological culprits. As it turns out, effect sizes linked with media effects theories get smaller but more statistically significant. Optimistically, this may signal that, just like humans, theories that grow long in the tooth lose some of their youthful spark but gain stability.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf032

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nathan2025,
  title        = {{Is time of the essence? A temporal meta-synthesis of seven media effects theories}},
  author       = {Nathan Walter et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf032},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Is time of the essence? A temporal meta-synthesis of seven media effects theories

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.