Global value chains participation and income inequality in Africa

Lynda Chiagozie Nwufo et al.

Critical Perspectives on International Business2026https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-10-2024-0127article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose The welfare effects of Global Value Chains (GVC) participation remain highly under-researched, particularly in Africa. Hence, this study aims to empirically estimate the effect of GVC participation on income inequality in Africa and identify the channel(s) of effect. To achieve this broad objective, two specific objectives were set out: to estimate the effect of GVC participation on income inequality in Africa and to determine the channel(s) through which GVC participation affects income inequality in Africa. Design/methodology/approach The study used the dynamic system generalised method of moment estimation technique. Findings The findings of this study show that GVC has a significant positive impact on income inequality in Africa. In determining the channel(s) of effect, the results show that backward participation captured by the Foreign Value Added has a significant negative impact on income inequality in Africa. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of GVC participation on income equality in Africa. This study, therefore, opens a new frontier of knowledge in international business in Africa.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-10-2024-0127

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lynda2026,
  title        = {{Global value chains participation and income inequality in Africa}},
  author       = {Lynda Chiagozie Nwufo et al.},
  journal      = {Critical Perspectives on International Business},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-10-2024-0127},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Global value chains participation and income inequality in Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.