Learning from Students' Ethical Dilemmas

Maureen Snow Andrade et al.

Journal of Business Ethics Education2024https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee2024213article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Teaching ethics is a critical aspect of coursework in higher education business schools and to future business success. Recent research, however, indicates that business schools are focusing on the sustainability aspect of ethics, or grand challenges such as poverty and inequality, rather than helping students understand the underlying ethical considerations (Jaganjac 2024). A shift is needed to reclaim personal ethics education to develop future business leaders with the ability to act ethically. This calls for new pedagogies to help students form personal ethical frameworks and make appropriate ethical decisions. This research examines the outcomes of an ethical dilemma assignment. Using content analysis, the findings indicate that while students are able to identify ethical conflicts, they lack a fundamental personal ethical framework to understand the philosophical aspects of ethical conflicts. Additionally, they need training to equip them to intervene and address ethical dilemmas. Faculty who teach ethics in business schools should consider including practical assignments such as ethical dilemmas. They must also incorporate specific training to help students develop conflict management skills and know how to intervene.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee2024213

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maureen2024,
  title        = {{Learning from Students' Ethical Dilemmas}},
  author       = {Maureen Snow Andrade et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Business Ethics Education},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee2024213},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Learning from Students' Ethical Dilemmas

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.48 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.