What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic

Jakub Chini et al.

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries2023https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917231153063article
ABDC B
Weight
0.42

Abstract

After an introduction of competition due to liberalisation, there is an expectation of lower prices and better quality. However, these overall positive effects could be also driven by the incumbent’s incentive to exclude competition within the liberalised markets. Such a situation occurred on the Prague-Ostrava line where liberalisation brought lower prices and an increase in quality. However, it also brought multiple accusations by both the Czech competition authority and the European Commission of the state-owned incumbent, České dráhy, that it had engaged in predatory pricing. This paper then assesses whether the price decreases within this line were driven by actual competition or by predatory behaviour of České dráhy by analysing the position of České dráhy. The aim of this paper therefore is to assess the real market power of the Czech state incumbent, České dráhy, on the Prague-Ostrava line. To achieve this aim, we used unique data we had gathered from our previous research (such as price development, market shares and customer behaviour). Our results then show that it is unlikely that České dráhy could have acted independently of its competitors and customers, which indicates that it could not have had a dominant position.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917231153063

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jakub2023,
  title        = {{What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic}},
  author       = {Jakub Chini et al.},
  journal      = {Competition and Regulation in Network Industries},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917231153063},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.42

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.19 × 0.4 = 0.08
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.