Seeing the forest through the trees and on tees: Nature and consumer decision‐making

Kelly L. Haws & Amanda P. Yamim

Journal of Consumer Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1457article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Rim, Schertz, and Berman ( Journal of Consumer Psychology , 2025) present prior research examining the affective, cognitive, and social benefits of humans' interactions with nature. In doing so, they offer some specific applications to consumer psychology and encourage more research examining the consequences of nature interaction on consumer behaviors. We build on this important work by considering the breadth of potential forms of interaction between consumers and nature in both indoor and outdoor spaces as well as in real and virtual (i.e., representations of) nature exposures. We build on semantic activation and goal‐systems theory to elaborate further on how nature can influence consumers. Specifically, associations elicited by nature can activate or enhance the importance of certain goals during the consumption process, thus driving consumers' judgments and decision‐making. We elaborate on how nature can be specifically applied to the place, product, and promotion elements of the marketing mix and how future research can examine the consequences of nature interactions on consumer behavior.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1457

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kelly2025,
  title        = {{Seeing the forest through the trees and on tees: Nature and consumer decision‐making}},
  author       = {Kelly L. Haws & Amanda P. Yamim},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1457},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Seeing the forest through the trees and on tees: Nature and consumer decision‐making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.