On Curing Political Diseases: The Healing Power of Majoritarian Elections in Multi-Member Districts

Reiner Eichenberger & Patricia Schafer

Homo Oeconomicus2022https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00131-warticle
ABDC C
Weight
0.51

What the paper says

Abstract Democratic politics suffers from numerous diseases such as lack of inclusiveness, time-inconsistency, short-termism, negative campaigning, lack of trust in and between governments, and many more. These diseases affect all countries, albeit to a differing extent. How can they be cured? From a politico-economic perspective, an institutional approach is required. We look at a country where these political diseases seem to play a relatively minor role: Switzerland. So far, Switzerland is renowned for its extensive direct democracy and federalism. However, its electoral system has been largely neglected. It uniquely combines proportional representation and majoritarian elections on all government levels. In contrast to the international standard, Swiss majority votes do not take place in single-member districts but in multi-member districts. We analyze how the interplay of majoritarian elections in multi-member districts and proportional representation mitigates many of the political diseases.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00131-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{reiner2022,
  title        = {{On Curing Political Diseases: The Healing Power of Majoritarian Elections in Multi-Member Districts}},
  author       = {Reiner Eichenberger & Patricia Schafer},
  journal      = {Homo Oeconomicus},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00131-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On Curing Political Diseases: The Healing Power of Majoritarian Elections in Multi-Member Districts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.51

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.