Advancement on the Edge of Dreaming: Positionality as a Tool for Justice

Lisa Sargent & Geri L. Peak

American Journal of Evaluation2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261422677article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

As society slowly continues its momentum toward justice and repair, evaluators stand at a vital crossroads. In order for us to show up as better guides and co-creators, we must tend to and understand the particular sociopolitical contexts that we and our partners work and live within. Acute attention to positionality has the potential to transform evaluation into a more rigorous and humane field. Reflecting on our positionalities allows us to systematically explore the complex localities in which we are uniquely privileged and marginalized. By applying this lens to our evaluative practice, positionality becomes a counter to the notion of evaluators as objective actors. Developing core competencies in assessing one's own positionalities fortifies evaluators’ ability to identify how power dynamics influence evaluation approaches and phases. In the following piece, we will map our own journeys and reflect on individual commitments to upholding evaluation as a tool for justice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261422677

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lisa2026,
  title        = {{Advancement on the Edge of Dreaming: Positionality as a Tool for Justice}},
  author       = {Lisa Sargent & Geri L. Peak},
  journal      = {American Journal of Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261422677},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Advancement on the Edge of Dreaming: Positionality as a Tool for Justice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.