arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Earnings Premium: Major, Gender, and Double Majors in Economic Cycles

Edinaldo Tebaldi et al.

American Economist2025https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251351134article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The value of higher education is currently being questioned. This article uses microdata from the 2009–2022 American Community Survey (ACS) to analyze the impact of educational attainment, major, and double majors on labor market outcomes. By analyzing earnings and college majors, this research refines our understanding of education’s value for researchers, policymakers, and prospective students. Our work corroborates previous findings that bachelor’s degrees contribute significantly to higher earnings and that the choice of college major affects earnings. We also show that the increased resilience to economic downturns found for bachelor’s degree holders is positive for all majors, and that the positive impact differs by gender. We also show that the wage differential for BD holders follows a bell-shaped curve throughout a person’s lifetime. The decline in the wage premium in later years is particularly pronounced and starts earlier for women.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251351134

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{edinaldo2025,
  title        = {{The Earnings Premium: Major, Gender, and Double Majors in Economic Cycles}},
  author       = {Edinaldo Tebaldi et al.},
  journal      = {American Economist},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251351134},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Earnings Premium: Major, Gender, and Double Majors in Economic Cycles

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.