Parameter Estimation for Two Logistic Populations with Fuzzy Data: A Comparative Study of MLE and Bayesian Methods

Lingutla Vijay Kumar et al.

Model Assisted Statistics and Applications2026https://doi.org/10.1177/15741699261424809article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study addresses the challenge of estimating parameters for two logistic populations that share a common scale parameter but have different location parameters in the presence of fuzzy data. To handle these complexities, both Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and Bayesian methods are employed. Asymptotic confidence intervals are constructed using ML estimates. For Bayesian estimation, a conjugate prior is utilized, and Bayes estimators are approximated using Lindley’s method due to the lack of closed-form solutions. Furthermore, Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques, including Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and the Metropolis–Hastings (MH) algorithm, are utilized to sample from the posterior distributions and construct Highest Posterior Density (HPD) intervals. A detailed comparative analysis of MLE, Lindley’s approximation, ABC, HMC, and MH is conducted to assess their performance. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a real-world dataset under fuzzy conditions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15741699261424809

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lingutla2026,
  title        = {{Parameter Estimation for Two Logistic Populations with Fuzzy Data: A Comparative Study of MLE and Bayesian Methods}},
  author       = {Lingutla Vijay Kumar et al.},
  journal      = {Model Assisted Statistics and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15741699261424809},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Parameter Estimation for Two Logistic Populations with Fuzzy Data: A Comparative Study of MLE and Bayesian Methods

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.