Unboundedness in Bilevel Optimization

Bárbara Rodrigues et al.

Mathematical Programming2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-026-02344-2article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Bilevel optimization has garnered growing interest over the past decade. However, little attention has been paid to detecting and dealing with unboundedness in these problems, with most research assuming a bounded high-point relaxation. In this paper, we address unboundedness in bilevel and multilevel optimization by studying its computational complexity. We show that deciding whether an optimistic linear bilevel problem is unbounded is strongly NP-complete, even without coupling constraints. Furthermore, we extend the hardness result to the linear multilevel case, by showing that for each extra level added, the decision problem of checking unboundedness moves up a level in the polynomial hierarchy. Deciding unboundedness of a mixed-integer multilevel problem is shown to be one level higher in the polynomial complexity hierarchy than the decision problem for linear multilevel problem with the same number of levels. Finally, we introduce two algorithmic approaches to determine whether a linear bilevel problem is unbounded and, if so, return a certificate of unboundedness. This certificate consists of a direction of unboundedness and corresponding bilevel feasible point. We present a proof of concept of these algorithmic approaches on some relevant examples, and provide a brief computational comparison.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-026-02344-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bárbara2026,
  title        = {{Unboundedness in Bilevel Optimization}},
  author       = {Bárbara Rodrigues et al.},
  journal      = {Mathematical Programming},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-026-02344-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unboundedness in Bilevel Optimization

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.