On the Redistributive Impact of the Personal Income Tax: Evidence From South Africa

Nadine Riedel & Ida Zinke

South African Journal of Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.70013article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT South Africa is one of the most unequal economies globally. In this paper, we examine the design of its personal income tax (PIT), with a focus on its redistributive function. We apply the Pfähler decomposition method to analyse the redistributive effects of key components of the South African PIT system, including the marginal tax rate schedule, the definition of gross taxable income and the provision of tax deductions and tax credits. Our findings highlight that the marginal tax rate schedule is the primary driver of redistribution, while tax expenditures often favour higher income individuals, resulting in adverse redistributive effects. Additionally, we assess how recent changes to the PIT schedule have influenced redistribution. Among others, we show that below‐inflation adjustments of marginal tax thresholds reduced progressivity. We conclude by discussing policy options to enhance the redistributive capacity of South Africa's PIT system.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.70013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nadine2026,
  title        = {{On the Redistributive Impact of the Personal Income Tax: Evidence From South Africa}},
  author       = {Nadine Riedel & Ida Zinke},
  journal      = {South African Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.70013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the Redistributive Impact of the Personal Income Tax: Evidence From South Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.