Initial Public Offerings: A Synthesis of the Literature and Directions for Future Research

Michelle Lowry et al.

Foundations and Trends in Finance2017https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000050article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.75

Abstract

The purpose of this monograph is to provide an overview of the IPO literature since 2000. The fewer numbers of companies going public in recent years has raised many questions regarding the IPO process, in both academic and regulatory circles. As we all strive to understand these changes in the market, it is especially important to understand the dynamics underlying the IPO process. If the process of going public is too costly or the IPO mechanism is plagued by too many conflicts of interest among the various intermediaries, then private companies may rationally choose other methods of raising capital. In a related vein, it is imperative that new regulations not be based on research focusing solely on large, more mature firms. Newly public firms have unique characteristics, and an increased understanding of such issues will contribute positively to well-functioning public markets and further growth of the entrepreneurial sector. We also provide a detailed guide to researchers on how to obtain a research-quality sample of IPOs, from standard data sources. Related to this, we tabulate important corrections to these standard data sources.

219 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000050

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michelle2017,
  title        = {{Initial Public Offerings: A Synthesis of the Literature and Directions for Future Research}},
  author       = {Michelle Lowry et al.},
  journal      = {Foundations and Trends in Finance},
  year         = {2017},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000050},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Initial Public Offerings: A Synthesis of the Literature and Directions for Future Research

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.75

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.