Narrating violent victimization by positioning self and others

Mari Hatavara & Lois Presser

Narrative Inquiry2025https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24054.hatarticle
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Victimologists observe that telling one’s story can foster healing for survivors of violence. To understand these processes better, victims’ narratives must be understood as situated acts of telling. This paper takes one man’s narration of victimization long past — child abuse and rape — as a case. We examined his interview-derived storytelling with a focus on narrative positioning, narrative discourse modes, and negations. We found that Stefan (a pseudonym) used various discursive modes and narrative positionings to exercise control over the stories and what they mean. His agency was partly achieved by what he recounted not doing or saying, and what he refused to address in the interview situation. Thus, his narratives feature his own defiance and self-empowerment in both the scene and the aftermath of violence. These findings lead us to conclude that narrative strategies of storytelling should be taken into account in any practical interventions that involves testimony about harm.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24054.hat

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mari2025,
  title        = {{Narrating violent victimization by positioning self and others}},
  author       = {Mari Hatavara & Lois Presser},
  journal      = {Narrative Inquiry},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24054.hat},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Narrating violent victimization by positioning self and others

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.