arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Should We Focus More on Individual Differences or on Job Attitudes for Increased Job Performance? Four Decades of Research and a Monte Carlo Simulation

Dragoş Iliescu et al.

Journal of Business and Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10114-2article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines how stable individual differences and malleable job attitudes differentially translate into job performance, with a focus on quantifying relative efficiency contrasts under equalized assumptions. On one hand, we consider performance gains that follow from increasing levels of stable individual differences; on the other, we consider illustrative utility implications derived from job attitude associations. Based on an input matrix extracted from meta-analyses we conduct a Monte Carlo simulation for three alternative models linking individual differences and job attitudes to task and contextual job performance. We hereby untangle unique and shared validities while avoiding a substitutive “either/or” framing, and clarify where marginal performance leverage tends to reside per standardized unit increase in each class of predictors.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10114-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dragoş2026,
  title        = {{Should We Focus More on Individual Differences or on Job Attitudes for Increased Job Performance? Four Decades of Research and a Monte Carlo Simulation}},
  author       = {Dragoş Iliescu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Business and Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10114-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Should We Focus More on Individual Differences or on Job Attitudes for Increased Job Performance? Four Decades of Research and a Monte Carlo Simulation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.