On high-dimensional classification by sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression

The Tien Mai

Statistical Papers2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-025-01793-9article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This work addresses the problem of high-dimensional classification by exploring a generalized Bayesian logistic regression method under sparsity-inducing prior distributions. The method involves utilizing a fractional power of the likelihood, resulting in the fractional posterior. Our study yields concentration results for the fractional posterior, not only on the joint distribution of the predictors and response variable but also for the regression coefficients. Subsequently, we derive novel findings concerning misclassification excess risk bounds using sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression. Our results showcase the ability of our method to adapt to the unknown sparsity level. The results align with recent findings on penalized methods in the frequentist literature while requiring fewer assumptions. Moreover, we also present an analysis addressing model misspecification. Simulations and real data analyses are undertaken to validate our theoretical results.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-025-01793-9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{the2026,
  title        = {{On high-dimensional classification by sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression}},
  author       = {The Tien Mai},
  journal      = {Statistical Papers},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-025-01793-9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On high-dimensional classification by sparse generalized Bayesian logistic regression

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.