How redistribution can make carbon taxes more acceptable to the public

Troels Fage Hedegaard & Kristian Kongshøj

The Social Science Journal2024https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2416774article
ABDC C
Weight
0.64

What the paper says

Carbon taxation is a market-based, incentive-driven policy tool, and it is often recommended in mainstream environmental economics. However, it is, by design or in effect consumption taxation, meant to make high-emission products and services more expensive. When affecting consumer prices, the unintended consequence is that they affect those who earn the least the hardest. As a result, low-income groups are generally less supportive of carbon taxes. However, carbon tax reforms need not be regressive. Policy designs can include mechanisms of social compensation. In this article, we show that the popularity of carbon taxes can be improved if citizens are presented with a progressive carbon tax reform. This effect is mainly driven by higher support among low-income groups. This is tested using a split-sample experiment collected in Denmark and employing regressions to explore the differences.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2416774

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{troels2024,
  title        = {{How redistribution can make carbon taxes more acceptable to the public}},
  author       = {Troels Fage Hedegaard & Kristian Kongshøj},
  journal      = {The Social Science Journal},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2416774},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How redistribution can make carbon taxes more acceptable to the public

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.64

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.80 × 0.4 = 0.32
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.