SUVA: A Probabilistic Framework for Auditing LLMs with an Application to Social Preferences

Yan Leng & Yuan Yuan

Information Systems Research2026https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0857article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly deploying large language models (LLMs) as customer service agents, decision aids, and semiautonomous agents. We develop State–Understanding–Value–Action (SUVA), a probabilistic auditing framework that turns an LLM’s response into structured evidence about how its decision was produced. SUVA treats the prompt as the state, codes the model’s reasoning to extract its understanding and stated values using a transparent codebook, and then estimates how these elements statistically predict the eventual action. We demonstrate SUVA on social preference games from behavioral economics and show how the same workflow can audit other delegated decisions by using domain-specific prompts and value codebooks. Across eight widely used LLMs, SUVA reveals systematic prosocial and reciprocity patterns and shows how posttraining alignment reshapes them. For practice and policy, SUVA supports a repeatable audit, align, and reaudit workflow for model selection, compliance, and ongoing monitoring of deployed LLM systems.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0857

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yan2026,
  title        = {{SUVA: A Probabilistic Framework for Auditing LLMs with an Application to Social Preferences}},
  author       = {Yan Leng & Yuan Yuan},
  journal      = {Information Systems Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0857},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

SUVA: A Probabilistic Framework for Auditing LLMs with an Application to Social Preferences

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.