How Influencers Grow: An Empirical Study and Future Research Agenda

Colin Campbell et al.

Journal of Interactive Marketing2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251360683article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Most research on influencers takes the perspective of marketers, examining how influencers can be leveraged to build brands. However, as influencers grow in popularity, they are becoming a marketing force in their own right, warranting deeper exploration from their perspective. This article shifts the focus to influencers as active marketers, using a multilevel mixed-effects growth model to identify factors associated with follower growth. Analyzing a dataset of 14,311,145 pieces of Instagram content posted over more than two years from 6,079 influencers across 57 countries, the authors examine how attention labor (content strategy and persona appeal) and relationship labor (captioning strategy and ecosystem connectivity) relate to follower growth. Whereas existing research primarily focuses on engagement with specific pieces of content, this study takes a broader approach, investigating how influencers’ content and engagement strategies are associated with differences in follower growth over time. By reframing influencers as marketers rather than media vehicles, this study contributes to marketing theory and provides insights for influencers, influencer agencies, and marketers who seek to better understand influencer growth.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251360683

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{colin2025,
  title        = {{How Influencers Grow: An Empirical Study and Future Research Agenda}},
  author       = {Colin Campbell et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Interactive Marketing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251360683},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Influencers Grow: An Empirical Study and Future Research Agenda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.