arbiter
JournalsAccount

Time Well Spent? Rhythms of Dating on Apps before, during and after COVID-19 Social Restrictions

Neta Yodovich et al.

Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251412565article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines how the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the fore the disruption of temporal and rhythm norms among dating app users. Based on 53 retrospective interviews, the study found a transformation from short and quick interactions aimed at finding ideal partners to ‘slow intimacy’ characterised by deeper, prolonged conversations. As restrictions lifted, there was a return to previous dating habits, highlighting how what was experienced by many as a transformative moment in online dating was undermined by the resilience of established social rhythms despite temporary disruptions. The study underscores the complex interplay between individual agency, social norms and constraints in online dating practices associated with what we term neoliberal temporal normativities. It reveals that dating rhythms are influenced by interactions with other users and the app, rather than being determined by individual preferences, as users navigate their desires within the temporal constraints of the platform and prevailing social norms.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251412565

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{neta2026,
  title        = {{Time Well Spent? Rhythms of Dating on Apps before, during and after COVID-19 Social Restrictions}},
  author       = {Neta Yodovich et al.},
  journal      = {Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251412565},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Time Well Spent? Rhythms of Dating on Apps before, during and after COVID-19 Social Restrictions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.