Integrated multi-product, multi-level supply chain inventory model with joint replenishment and loss sharing

Firudin Sultanov & Parviz Hasanov

International Journal of Integrated Supply Management2024https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2024.138820article
AJG 1
Weight
0.43

What the paper says

The size and frequency of orders placed by buyers affect the inventory replenishment policies of upstream supply chain members as well. Cooperation among supply chain parties plays a paramount role in improving the performance of inventory control and designing a cost-effective supply chain. This study develops an integrated inventory model for a three-tiered supply chain comprising of multiple suppliers delivering multiple products to a single manufacturer. Our paper makes the following contributions to the literature. First, a grouping method is proposed to handle cost and order calculation for multiple products. Second, we evaluate the total relevant cost for both the system and the supply chain members by employing a joint economic lot sizing model under various coordination scenarios. Finally, we propose a loss-sharing mechanism to compensate supply chain members who are worse off due to coordination. We use real data of an electronic device manufacturing company in extensive numerical studies and provide managerial implications.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2024.138820

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{firudin2024,
  title        = {{Integrated multi-product, multi-level supply chain inventory model with joint replenishment and loss sharing}},
  author       = {Firudin Sultanov & Parviz Hasanov},
  journal      = {International Journal of Integrated Supply Management},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2024.138820},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integrated multi-product, multi-level supply chain inventory model with joint replenishment and loss sharing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.43

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.30 × 0.4 = 0.12
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.