arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Employees Performance Evaluation in Defense Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia based on Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) and System Dynamic (SD)

A. P. Sumarno et al.

International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management2021https://doi.org/10.46970/2021.27.3.4article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

This study aims at providing an evaluation of the performance of personnel in the ministry of defense. Analysis approaches employed in this study were AHP and System Dynamics within the framework of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model. Furthermore, the evaluation value obtained from the performance of the ministry of defense is 3.970 included in Good category. Based on the results of the simulation of Systems Dynamics, there is an increase in the rating level from 3.97 to 4.35. Therefore, now, it is in Very Good category in which it was in Good category two years ago.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46970/2021.27.3.4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{a.2021,
  title        = {{Employees Performance Evaluation in Defense Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia based on Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) and System Dynamic (SD)}},
  author       = {A. P. Sumarno et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46970/2021.27.3.4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Employees Performance Evaluation in Defense Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia based on Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) and System Dynamic (SD)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.14 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.