arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Organic Neoliberalism: A.O. Hirschman’s ‘Exit Option’ and Grassroots Processes of Marketization

Mark Gibson

Theory, Culture and Society2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251399791article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The article contributes to the literature on neoliberalism by offering an alternative account of processes of marketization to those that have centred their analysis on ideological or discursive formations. Drawing on Albert O. Hirschman’s 1970 book Exit, Voice and Loyalty , it identifies a phenomenon that we might call ‘organic’ neoliberalism, proceeding from population-level decisions for ‘exit’ over ‘voice’. The perspective seeks to complement rather than to reject or displace established accounts of neoliberal marketization, whether these tend more to a Marxist focus on interested agents or to a Foucauldian emphasis on neoliberal ‘rationalities’. At the same time, it suggests a more plural understanding of the causes of marketization, helping to explain certain unresolved paradoxes and to open up hopeful possibilities for social and political futures ‘after neoliberalism’.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251399791

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mark2026,
  title        = {{Organic Neoliberalism: A.O. Hirschman’s ‘Exit Option’ and Grassroots Processes of Marketization}},
  author       = {Mark Gibson},
  journal      = {Theory, Culture and Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251399791},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Organic Neoliberalism: A.O. Hirschman’s ‘Exit Option’ and Grassroots Processes of Marketization

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.