arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Investigating the Validity Evidence of Automated Scoring Methods for Divergent Thinking Assessments

Janika Saretzki & Mathias Benedek

Creativity Research Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2025.2607669article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

No abstract available.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2025.2607669

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{janika2026,
  title        = {{Investigating the Validity Evidence of Automated Scoring Methods for Divergent Thinking Assessments}},
  author       = {Janika Saretzki & Mathias Benedek},
  journal      = {Creativity Research Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2025.2607669},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Investigating the Validity Evidence of Automated Scoring Methods for Divergent Thinking Assessments

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.