Did it 'Really' Happen? Cost of Living Inequality in Argentina, 2004-2018

G Adám

Prague Economic Papers2025https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.894article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Measures of inequality typically rely on price indices formulated for a representative consumer, falsely assuming an identical consumption basket across households within the country. However, consumption patterns differ across households; hence, the changes in price levels might have different impacts on households at different points in the income distribution. To challenge this prevailing assumption and gain a more accurate comprehension of income inequality in Argentina from 2004 to 2018, I constructed income level-specific cost of living indices using the Argentinian Household Expenditure Survey. The results demonstrated that from 2004 to 2012, the poor experienced a higher increase in the cost of living compared to the richest group. Conversely, between 2012 and 2018, price changes displayed anti-rich behaviour. Considering the cost of living index differentials in the Gini coefficient calculations highlights that the price movements had an inegalitarian bias between 2004 and 2012, whereas the trend reversed in the 2012-2018 period.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.894

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{g2025,
  title        = {{Did it 'Really' Happen? Cost of Living Inequality in Argentina, 2004-2018}},
  author       = {G Adám},
  journal      = {Prague Economic Papers},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.894},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Did it 'Really' Happen? Cost of Living Inequality in Argentina, 2004-2018

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.