arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Introduction to Part II: Do We Do Science? Philosophy and Knowledge in International Business and Management

Timothy M. Devinney et al.

Advances in International Management2013https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026009book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

If we look to the uniqueness of IB/IM scholarship and ask where it stands separate from standard and traditional management and business research we really have only two differentiating, but exceedingly important, factors that justify discussing IB/IM as a separate research paradigm (See, e.g., Devinney, Pedersen, & Tihanyi, 2010).

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{timothy2013,
  title        = {{Introduction to Part II: Do We Do Science? Philosophy and Knowledge in International Business and Management}},
  author       = {Timothy M. Devinney et al.},
  journal      = {Advances in International Management},
  year         = {2013},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-5027(2013)0000026009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Introduction to Part II: Do We Do Science? Philosophy and Knowledge in International Business and Management

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.