arbiter
JournalsAccount

Informative Value of Non‐Financial Reports: Analyzing the Impact of Disclosure Format and Auditing

Simon Hirsch & Veronika Heichl

Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance2025https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22784article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Since the Non‐Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) came into force in 2017, large, listed companies in the European Union (EU) are obliged to disclose non‐financial reports annually. Accordingly, Member States transposed the Directive into national law with country‐specific rules. Thus far, quantifying the informational content has proven to be difficult. Therefore, we applied an innovative text‐mining approach to assess the informative value of non‐financial reports and its influential determinants, the so‐called Sustainable Fingerprint. This method measures how precisely environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics and time references are disclosed in non‐financial reports. The aim of our paper is to analyze the informative value of non‐financial reports from companies in the main stock indices of France, Germany, Italy, and Sweden after the national NFRD implementation. Our results show that incorporating the non‐financial report in the annual report and the audit committee expertise (ACE) are positively related to the informative value, whereas external assurance has no significant impact.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22784

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{simon2025,
  title        = {{Informative Value of Non‐Financial Reports: Analyzing the Impact of Disclosure Format and Auditing}},
  author       = {Simon Hirsch & Veronika Heichl},
  journal      = {Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22784},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Informative Value of Non‐Financial Reports: Analyzing the Impact of Disclosure Format and Auditing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.