Employee engagement: three levels of analysis measurement

Hary Febriansyah et al.

Measuring Business Excellence2026https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-03-2025-0032article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose Given the clear correlation between employee engagement (EE) and organizational success, firms often emphasize enhancing EE and, in turn, need to measure it. However, studies on developing approaches for such measurement have been limited. In this manuscript, the authors revisit the elaboration methods of presenting EE measurement. The three assessments are carried out to reveal varying degrees of EE and pick up varying shaping variables. Rather than contrasting the benefits and drawbacks of those three metrics, this study aims to elucidate how each measures EE at various analytical levels. Design/methodology/approach In a mixed-methods study involving questionnaires and interviews, this paper examined three approaches of measuring EE – questionnaires, interviews and text analysis – among 454 employees of state-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Findings Results show high reliability and validity between the different approaches. Questionnaires assessed engagement objectively, while interviews captured emotional bonding and text analysis reflected unconditional level. Originality/value The results suggest that different approaches should be used to align levels of EE with company-specific purposes and strategies and thus afford a new understanding of various ways of assessing EE.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-03-2025-0032

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hary2026,
  title        = {{Employee engagement: three levels of analysis measurement}},
  author       = {Hary Febriansyah et al.},
  journal      = {Measuring Business Excellence},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-03-2025-0032},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Employee engagement: three levels of analysis measurement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.