Toward Complementary Intelligence: Integrating Cognitive and Machine AI

Cleotilde Gonzalez & Tailia Malloy

Current Directions in Psychological Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251407571article
AJG 4
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article calls for complementary human-AI intelligence. Rather than redefining intelligence to fit machine capabilities, we argue for designing AI that complements and extends human cognition. We distinguish between cognitive AI , which is grounded in cognitive science to model human perception, learning, and decision-making, and machine AI , which achieves large-scale performance through data-driven optimization. Building on advances in machine learning alignment and human-AI complementarity, we propose an integrative framework that connects cognitive and machine AI across four routes: embedding integration , aligning human and machine representations; instruction encoding , using machine AI to translate goals into cognitive AI; training agents , using cognitive AI to guide and train machine AI through human-like data; and coevolving agents , enabling cognitive and machine AI to coadapt and improve together over time. These integration routes provide a foundation for complementary intelligence : systems that combine human interpretability with machine scalability and precision to enhance trust, adaptability, and human agency in complex sociotechnical environments.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251407571

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cleotilde2026,
  title        = {{Toward Complementary Intelligence: Integrating Cognitive and Machine AI}},
  author       = {Cleotilde Gonzalez & Tailia Malloy},
  journal      = {Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251407571},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Toward Complementary Intelligence: Integrating Cognitive and Machine AI

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.