Modern Data Architectures: Evaluation Framework for Selecting Suitable Data Platforms
Félix Espinoza et al.
What the paper says
This paper addresses the challenge of selecting a suitable modern data architecture in the context of growing data complexity, increased demand for real-time analytics, and evolving business needs. Methodology/Approach: The study follows the DSR process. The paper presents a structured evaluation framework based on clearly defined criteria across technical, organisational, and economic dimensions. The framework supports decision-makers in comparing data architectures, including Data Warehouse, Data Lake, and Data Lakehouse, through a weighted scoring system. Findings: The outcome highlights the advantages of the Data Lakehouse paradigm for the evaluating organisation, which sought to combine flexibility, scalability, and advanced analytics capabilities. This paper contributes a practical and adaptable methodology that aligns enterprise and data architecture decisions. Research Limitation/Implications: Since each question may hold varying importance for the evaluator, it is recommended that each individual question be weighted. The evaluator must possess the necessary knowledge to assign weights. Originality/Value of paper: The methodology provides a foundation for further research on data architectures and their evaluation. It can serve as a starting point for the development of analytical tools and the implementation of case studies.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.