Modern Data Architectures: Evaluation Framework for Selecting Suitable Data Platforms

Félix Espinoza et al.

Quality Innovation Prosperity2025https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v29i2.2203article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This paper addresses the challenge of selecting a suitable modern data architecture in the context of growing data complexity, increased demand for real-time analytics, and evolving business needs. Methodology/Approach: The study follows the DSR process. The paper presents a structured evaluation framework based on clearly defined criteria across technical, organisational, and economic dimensions. The framework supports decision-makers in comparing data architectures, including Data Warehouse, Data Lake, and Data Lakehouse, through a weighted scoring system. Findings: The outcome highlights the advantages of the Data Lakehouse paradigm for the evaluating organisation, which sought to combine flexibility, scalability, and advanced analytics capabilities. This paper contributes a practical and adaptable methodology that aligns enterprise and data architecture decisions. Research Limitation/Implications: Since each question may hold varying importance for the evaluator, it is recommended that each individual question be weighted. The evaluator must possess the necessary knowledge to assign weights. Originality/Value of paper: The methodology provides a foundation for further research on data architectures and their evaluation. It can serve as a starting point for the development of analytical tools and the implementation of case studies.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v29i2.2203

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{félix2025,
  title        = {{Modern Data Architectures: Evaluation Framework for Selecting Suitable Data Platforms}},
  author       = {Félix Espinoza et al.},
  journal      = {Quality Innovation Prosperity},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v29i2.2203},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Modern Data Architectures: Evaluation Framework for Selecting Suitable Data Platforms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.