Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion
Ramon Tomazela
What the paper says
This article critically examines the substance-based income exclusion (SBIE) under Pillar Two, highlighting its conceptual shortcomings, allocative distortions and bias toward tangible-intensive business models. It argues that the current formula inadequately reflects economic reality and proposes alternative approaches for determining routine returns consistent with modern multinational activities.
Evidence weight
0.50
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.