← Back to results Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion Ramon Tomazela
Abstract This article critically examines the substance-based income exclusion (SBIE) under Pillar Two, highlighting its conceptual shortcomings, allocative distortions and bias toward tangible-intensive business models. It argues that the current formula inadequately reflects economic reality and proposes alternative approaches for determining routine returns consistent with modern multinational activities.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/1pjarjk Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{ramon2026,
title = {{Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion}},
author = {Ramon Tomazela},
journal = {Bulletin for International Taxation},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/1pjarjk},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion
AU - Tomazela, Ramon
JO - Bulletin for International Taxation
PY - 2026
ER - Ramon Tomazela (2026). Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion. *Bulletin for International Taxation*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/1pjarjk Ramon Tomazela. "Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion." *Bulletin for International Taxation* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/1pjarjk. Pillar Two and the Tax Policy Challenges of the Substance-Based Income Exclusion
Ramon Tomazela · Bulletin for International Taxation · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/1pjarjk Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.