arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Evaluating the Modified Barthel Index for Policy and Practice in Reablement: Lessons From Australia's Short‐Term Restorative Care Program

Luke Schmidt et al.

Australasian Journal on Ageing2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70136article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study provides a solid evidence base to guide the implementation of assessments in future programs and studies. This is due to the identification of limitations of the sole reporting metric used in the program. Based on findings throughout this manuscript, a range of standardised assessments dependent on the participant's goals should be implemented in future programs, such as the Restorative Care Pathway in the Support at Home program.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70136

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luke2026,
  title        = {{Evaluating the Modified Barthel Index for Policy and Practice in Reablement: Lessons From Australia's Short‐Term Restorative Care Program}},
  author       = {Luke Schmidt et al.},
  journal      = {Australasian Journal on Ageing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70136},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evaluating the Modified Barthel Index for Policy and Practice in Reablement: Lessons From Australia's Short‐Term Restorative Care Program

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.