On seeing the self as a scarce resource: How time and money scarcity differentially shape consumers' self‐value and preferences

Jane So et al.

Journal of Consumer Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1460article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in studying the psychology of scarcity and its effect on consumers, little research has investigated whether the effect of resource scarcity depends on the type of scarce resource. Across six studies, we identify the distinct psychological and decision‐making consequences of two types of resource scarcity: time and money. We hypothesize that time and money scarcity can differentially influence consumer preferences by altering self‐perceptions. Time (vs. money) scarcity leads to perceiving the self as a scarce resource, and these self‐perceptions result in time‐ (vs. money‐) scarce consumers drawing more favorable assessments of self‐value and preferring options that reflect their heightened self‐value. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the differential effect of time versus money scarcity only holds for consumption choices reflecting self‐value. We also identify an important moderating condition: the source of the experience of scarcity, specifically whether it was self‐chosen or not.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1460

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jane2025,
  title        = {{On seeing the self as a scarce resource: How time and money scarcity differentially shape consumers' self‐value and preferences}},
  author       = {Jane So et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1460},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On seeing the self as a scarce resource: How time and money scarcity differentially shape consumers' self‐value and preferences

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.