arbiter
JournalsAccount

The law of digital afterlife: the Chinese experience of AI ‘resurrection’ and ‘grief tech’

Ken Cheng

International Journal of Law and Information Technology2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae029article
ABDC A
Weight
0.54

Abstract

This article considers the prominent private law and regulatory problems relating to the practice of AI ‘resurrection’ where a digital replica with the appearance, voice, and personality of the deceased is created to interact with the real world. The intention is to offer solace and comfort to the bereaved by interacting with a digital representation of their loved one, providing a semblance of continued presence as if the departed had never left this world. This article first considers the industry of AI ‘resurrection’ in the context of ‘grief tech’. It uses the Chinese experience for discussion as to date the practice is most prevalent in China but the legal considerations are applicable to other jurisdictions. It then discusses whether and how the practice may constitute the infringement of the deceased’s portrait right as a personality interest protected under the Civil Code and its remedies. It finally considers the regulatory aspects of AI ‘resurrection’ with respect to personal information, deep synthesis and AI generative technology.

9 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae029

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ken2025,
  title        = {{The law of digital afterlife: the Chinese experience of AI ‘resurrection’ and ‘grief tech’}},
  author       = {Ken Cheng},
  journal      = {International Journal of Law and Information Technology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae029},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The law of digital afterlife: the Chinese experience of AI ‘resurrection’ and ‘grief tech’

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.52 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.72 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.