arbiter
JournalsAccount

The moderating role of collective narcissism in White Americans’ psychological defensiveness to the history of racism

H. Annie Vu & Luis M. Rivera

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261418031article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Since teaching about past racism in the United States often necessitates deliberations over White Americans’ ingroup transgressions, it can elicit historical defensiveness. We tested this hypothesis across three experiments ( N s = 109, 263, and 601) and further investigated if this effect was moderated by White collective narcissism. White American participants were randomly assigned to an ingroup transgression (presented with the history of racism) or an ingroup nontransgression (presented with the history of general events) condition. Across all experiments, (a) facing ingroup transgressions increased perceived ingroup responsibility among participants with low collective narcissism but not among those with high collective narcissism, and (b) among participants facing ingroup transgressions only, strong collective narcissism was consistently associated with less perceived ingroup responsibility. This research highlights the potential dangers of collective narcissism in erasing the history of racism.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261418031

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{h.2026,
  title        = {{The moderating role of collective narcissism in White Americans’ psychological defensiveness to the history of racism}},
  author       = {H. Annie Vu & Luis M. Rivera},
  journal      = {Group Processes and Intergroup Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261418031},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The moderating role of collective narcissism in White Americans’ psychological defensiveness to the history of racism

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.